Bridging dan Standarisasi Protokol dalam Integrasi Electronic Medical Record, Laboratory Information System, dan Picture Archiving and Communication System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54342/y767sy53Keywords:
EMR, LIS, PACS, BRIDGING, Interoperability, Protocol Standardization, HL7 FHIRAbstract
Interoperabilitas antara Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Laboratory Information System (LIS), dan Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) kini bukan lagi sekadar nilai tambah, melainkan kebutuhan operasional sekaligus regulatif bagi rumah sakit modern. Di banyak negara maju, LIS dan PACS telah diperlakukan sebagai sub-sistem yang menyatu dengan EMR, sementara di sejumlah negara berkembang termasuk Indonesia, ketiga sistem tersebut masih kerap dikelola secara terpisah, sehingga mekanisme bridging dan standarisasi protokol belum menjadi agenda strategis utama. Artikel ini menggunakan metode tinjauan literatur sistematis untuk mengkaji bagaimana bridging dan standarisasi protokol dapat diwujudkan antara EMR, LIS, dan PACS. Sumber literatur ditelusuri dari ScienceDirect, PubMed, SpringerLink, IEEE Xplore, DOAJ, dan Google Scholar, memadukan kajian klasik dengan publikasi terbitan sepuluh tahun terakhir. Hasil tinjauan menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan integrasi bertumpu pada delapan pilar yang saling berkaitan, yaitu: (1) kebutuhan standar data dan terminologi medis, (2) aspek privasi dan keamanan data, (3) praktik entri data yang terstruktur, (4) kesiapan teknologi dan sistem informasi, (5) komitmen kepemimpinan dan dukungan kebijakan, (6) standar dan protokol sistem, (7) pola dan model integrasi yang sesuai, serta (8) standarisasi protokol jaringan mengacu pada model referensi OSI.
References
[1] Aldosari, B. (2014). Rates, levels, and determinants of electronic health record system adoption: A study of hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(5), 330–342.
[2] Allones, J.L., Martinez, D., & Taboada, M. (2014). Automated mapping of clinical terms into SNOMED-CT: An application to codify procedures in pathology. Journal of Medical Systems, 38(10).
[3] Ayaz, M., Pasha, M.F., Alzahrani, M.Y., Budiarto, R., & Stiawan, D. (2021). The Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(4), 855–870.
[4] Bellon, E., et al. (2011). Trends in PACS architecture. European Journal of Radiology, 78, 199–204.
[5] Benjamin, M., Aradi, Y., & Shreiber, R. (2010). From shared data to sharing workflow: Merging PACS and teleradiology. European Journal of Radiology, 73, 3–9.
[6] Berg, M. (2004). Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology in Health Care Work. London: Routledge.
[7] Bouamrane, M., & Mair, F.S. (2014). Implementation of an integrated preoperative care pathway and regional electronic clinical portal for preoperative assessment. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 1–19.
[8] Çağındı, Ö., & Ötleş, S. (2004). Importance of laboratory information management systems (LIMS) software for food processing factories. Journal of Food Engineering, 65(4), 565–568.
[9] Dash, R.C., Jones, N., Merrick, R., Haroske, G., Harrison, J., Sayers, C., Haarselhorst, N., Wintell, M., Herrmann, M.D., & Macary, F. (2021). Integrating the Health-care Enterprise Pathology and Laboratory Medicine guideline for digital pathology interoperability. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 12, 16.
[10] Faggioni, L., et al. (2011). The future of PACS in healthcare enterprises. European Journal of Radiology, 78, 253–258.
[11] Fridell, K., et al. (2009). PACS influence the radiographer’s work.
[12] Hakam, F. (2016a). Analisis, Perancangan dan Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publishing.
[13] Hakam, F. (2016b). Implementasi Electronic Medical Record (EMR) di Sarana Pelayanan Kesehatan. Malang.
[14] Hakam, F. (2017). Rencana Strategis Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi (RENSTRA SI-TI) Rumah Sakit. Yogyakarta: TEKNOSAIN (CV Graha Ilmu).
[15] Heinzer, M. (2010). Electronic medical records: Concept, benefits, and implementation in health care organizations.
[16] HL7. (2018). Introduction to HL7 Standards. Health Level Seven International. Tersedia pada: http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/
[17] Hsieh, J.C., & Lo, H.C. (2010). The clinical application of a PACS-dependent 12-lead ECG and image information system in E-medicine and telemedicine. Journal of Digital Imaging, 23(4), 501–513.
[18] Huang, H.K. (2008). Utilization of medical imaging informatics and biometrics technologies in healthcare delivery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 3, 27–39.
[19] Hurlen, P., et al. (2012). Does PACS improve diagnostic accuracy in chest radiograph interpretations in clinical practice? European Journal of Radiology, 81(1), 173–177.
[20] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI.
[21] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2023). SATUSEHAT Platform: Panduan Interoperabilitas dan Standar HL7 FHIR. Tersedia pada: https://satusehat.kemkes.go.id/platform/docs/id/interoperability/
[22] Kruse, C.S., Stein, A., Thomas, H., & Kaur, H. (2018). The use of electronic health records to support population health: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(11), 214.
[23] Le, A.H.T., & Liu, B. (2009). Integration of computer-aided diagnosis/detection (CAD) results in a PACS environment using CAD–PACS toolkit and DICOM SR – Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, 317–329.
[24] LOINC. (2018). Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes. Regenstrief Institute.
[25] Nolden, M., et al. (2013). The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: Challenges and advances – 10 years of open-source development. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 8, 607–620.
[26] Pynoo, B., et al. (2011). Do hospital physicians’ attitudes change during PACS implementation? A cross-sectional acceptance study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(2), 88–97.
[27] Raharja, P.U. (2011). Penerapan Health Level 7 (HL7) pada Radiology Information System (RIS). Surabaya.
[28] Russom, D., et al. (2012). Implementation of a configurable laboratory information management system for use in cellular process development and manufacturing. Cytotherapy, 14(1), 114–121.
[29] Sutton, L.N. (2011). PACS and diagnostic imaging service delivery – a UK perspective. European Journal of Radiology, 78, 243–249.
[30] Turner, E., et al. (n.d.). Implementing a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) in an Army Corps of Engineers’ Water Quality Testing Laboratory.
[31] Vorisek, C.N., Lehne, M., Klopfenstein, S.A.I., Mayer, P.J., Bartschke, A., Haese, T., & Thun, S. (2022). Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) for interoperability in health research: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(7), e35724.
[32] World Health Organization. (2021). Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO.
[33] WHO Executive Board. (2024). Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025: Progress Update. Geneva: WHO
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 FAHMI HAKAM, Bambang Eka Purnama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)

